Making the community
to policy connection:
A ringside view to the World Parks Congress-2003
Bahar Dutt
(A WTI consultant, Bahar writes
a personal account of the issues facing this important
policy meeting. She works for the rehabilitation of
snake charmers in northern India and attended the
decennial World Parks Congress in Durban, South Africa).
 |
Representatives
from all over the globe at the Congress |
The 5th IUCN World Parks Congress was
held in Durban, South Africa from 8 to 17 September,
2003. The IUCN World Congress on Protected Areas is
a 10 yearly event that provides a major global forum
to set the agenda for protected areas (PAs). It offers
a unique opportunity to take stock of protected areas,
provide an honest appraisal of progress and setbacks
and chart the course for protected areas over the
next decade and beyond.
As a delegate at the World Parks Congress, I was
helping out at the ‘Community Park’, a
physical space created for all community representatives,
indigenous and mobile people, to make sure their voice
was heard by the policy makers. This was the first
time that community members from different parts of
the world had gathered in such large numbers at the
World Parks Congress. The Community Park was dedicated
to spotlight stories from grassroots, sustainable
development victories by community level action around
the world and to encourage dialogue about future challenges
for protected areas.
As the World Parks Congress opened on September 8th
at Durban, participants were welcomed into the Community
Park by songs from a local choir of disabled youth
from a South African school. The proceeds from this
performance were to be used to purchase musical instruments
and equipment. The ‘Community Park’ was
inaugurated in a solemn ceremony by a Zulu leader
who lit a fire and requested his ancestors to ‘bless
the space’. Representatives of indigenous communities
and mobile communities held hands and prayed that
they would be able to meet their objectives at the
World Parks.
As I observed the ceremony, I wondered whether the
community members, in this whole melee of ministers,
policy makers and CEOs of leading organizations be
able to hold their sway? I was skeptical. Would all
these community people who had traveled so far be
able to influence policy related to parks or access
to wildlife resources. I wondered. The coming days
would tell.
On the first day, Achim Steiner, IUCN Director General
and WPC Master of Ceremonies, welcomed all participants,
and highlighted the accomplishment in designating
at least 10% of the earth’s surface as PAs.
Nelson Mandela, former President of South Africa
and Congress Patron, stressed the need to involve
youth in PA management, and to consider PAs’
contribution to poverty alleviation. Thabo Mbeki,
President of South Africa, drew attention to the UN
Millennium Declaration and the Johannesburg Plan of
Implementation, identified poverty and under-development
as major threats to nature conservation and commended
the New Partnership for Africa’s Development
(NEPAD) for combining environmental and social goals.
 |
An indigenous
community leader |
Two days into the conference, as I walked from one
Congress session to the other at the Durban International
Conference Centre, I was struck by the strong presence
and sheer diversity of local communities. Masaais
from Kenya, Maoris from New Zealand, Rabaris from
India, they were present in all the sessions or workshops
of the Congress, to make sure their voices were heard.
I was not the only one struck by their presence.
Richard Leakey, two days into the Congress, at a plenary
workshop expressed concern on the ‘indigenization
of conservation’ and whether this was turning
into a ‘political agenda’. The strong
presence of local communities made many uneasy.
Back at the ‘Community Park’, we had
organized a special session. A dialogue between local
community leaders and CEOs of international conservation
organizations. The dialogue proved to be groundbreaking
in many ways as this was the first time that community
leaders could have a direct dialogue with global leaders
of NGOs. As John Croxall head of Birdlife International
stated “this was the first time I have realized
that mobile people have a significant impact on ecosystems
and we need to take into account their presence when
we design policies for bird habitats”. Similiarly,
Steve Mcormack, President, Nature Conservancy, after
listening to the testimonies of indigenous people
who had been displaced from their lands after the
declaration of their area as protected said, “I
stand here humbled by your statements.
I cannot believe that people have been moved from
their lands for wildlife conservation. Nature Conservancy
would like to support conservation projects that work
with people. The theme of this Congress is benefits
beyond boundaries. We need to in fact look at benefits
without boundaries”. Russell Mittermier, President
of Conservation International assured indigenous leaders
that his organization, in all their conservation projects
around the world, ensures that they work in close
coordination with local communities
 |
A session
in progress |
As I facilitated the dialogue, indigenous leaders
came forward to give their testimonies. It was heartening
to note that the global leaders had not come with
any pre-conceived notions and were willing to listen
with an open mind. They were not defensive and in
fact quite keen to understand how their policies could
translate into effective policies for community based
conservation within their respective organizations.
Perhaps a fitting end to the days’ session
was the arrival of a group of youth leaders who had
cycled through protected areas that spans South Africa,
Zimbabwe and Botswana. These youngsters, from communities
located within the Limpopo Transfrontier Park, rode
990 kms to come to Durban. Along the way, they spoke
with their communities and others to gather messages
to bring to the World Parks Congress. They were welcomed
to the Congress by Achim Steiner head of the IUCN.
As an Indian, perhaps one of the most enjoyable evenings
was the ‘India Nite’ which we decided
to organise at the ‘Community Park’ on
Saturday, 13th September. It was ironic that so many
of us as Indians were participating at the Congress
but had not sat together for even one evening. There
did seem to be much bonhomie and cheer as we all sat
together to share our experiences of the World Parks.
Boro, a ranger from Kaziranga National Park, shared
his experiences of being at the Congress. Kanhaiya
from Rajasthan said, “I am delighted to be here,
at first it all seemed like one big mela. But I have
realized that some important issues are being discussed
here. And it is good to meet communities from other
parts of the world who are facing similair problems
like us”. Vijay Jardhari from Uttaranchal spoke
about the Chipko movement and how his community had
saved the forests from being cut in Northern India.
 |
The Indian delegation |
Mr Vinod Rishi who was leading the Indian delegation
expressed his apprehension about the strong presence
of communities and said, “there are people here
who are talking about their rights. I am worried who
is going to talk about the thousands of animals, plants
and trees and their rights”.
Despite differences in opinion between NGOs, community
leaders and government officials from India, at least,
for that one evening it was heartening to see forest
officials, community leaders sharing the floor together
(literally!).
10 days has gone by and it was the final session
of the World Parks Congress. The WPC-2003 had proved
to be historic in many ways. Never before had so many
community leaders participated. Although I had been
apprehensive of how meaningful their presence would
be, I was wrong. The Durban Accord, the main output
of the Congress, proposes a new paradigm for PAs that
integrates conservation goals with sustainable development
in an equitable way.
Celebrating the diversity of nature and cultures,
the multiple benefits from PAs, and successes in their
conservation, the Accord highlights a number of concerns,
including a lack of recognition of the conservation
efforts of local communities and mobile and indigenous
people. A recommendation has also been made for an
‘International Commission on Truth and Reconciliation’
for people who have been displaced from protected
areas
Every evening, I would observe community leaders,
who could not even understand each others’ language
engage in hectic lobbying for their rights with policy
makers. This had paid off to a great extent.
As 3000 delegates who had gathered at Durban for
the historic Congress, boarded their flights home,
it was clear, that globally there had been, at least
at the policy level, a paradigm shift in conservation
policy. One which recognised the rights of local communities
and the need to end the ‘fences and fines approach’
to conservation. How this policy translates into an
effective regime for conservation and community participation
at the local level is what remains to be seen.
(Bahar Dutt was involved in the Community Park which
was supported by Conservation International, The Equator
Initiative, IUCN, The Nature Conservancy, TILCEPA,
GEF/UNDP Small Grants Programme and UNDP.)