LEGAL
TRAINING PROGRAMME A SHOT IN THE ARM FOR VALMIKI STAFF
VALMIKI NAGAR (BIHAR), APRIL 22: The
staff of Valmiki Tiger Reserve, till the other day,
were hamstrung by their lack of adequate information
about wildlife laws. Now they are a rejuvenated lot
and are looking forward to using their knowledge in
effectively dealing with wildlife crime.
The men in question were a group of range officers
and foresters of Valmiki TR who had assembled at the
Kotraha Forest Rest House here recently to attend an
intensive training programme organised by the Van Rakshak
Project of the Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) under the
aegis of its Wild Aid Programme.
This VRP training programme was the first time that
one of such kind has been held in Bihar. The workshop
assumes significance in view of the fact that Valmiki
TR is a critical tiger habitat spread over an area of
over 880 sq km in the northwest extreme of West Champaran
district of
the state. Infrastructural facilities here are not worth
writing home about and the staff are ill-equipped to
look into the management of the tiger reserve.
In all, there were 20 range officers and foresters
who attended the training module. The Chief Wildlife
Warden of Bihar, Mr Bashir Ahmed Khan, the Field Director
of Valmiki Tiger Reserve, Mr DK Shukla, the Divisional
Forest Officer – II, Mr AK Dwivedi, and the Divisional
Forest Officer – I, Mr B P Sinha, and Assistant
Conservator of Forests, Mr Nagendra Chowdhury, also
attended the workshop.
Mr Sudhir Mishra, Legal Advisor with WTI who has conducted
more than 30 similar workshops elsewhere in the country
prior to this one, admitted that the participants had
little clue about legal provisions meant to safeguard
forests and wildlife. “Their ideas on how to go
about litigations was negligible,” he said.
For instance, forest officials of Valmiki TR like their
counterparts in many places in the country are habituated
in using Sections 9 and 51 of the Wildlife (Protection)
Act in trying to prosecute offenders. Mr Mishra’s
assertion that Section 2 too must be used simultaneously
made them look at the whole gamut of prosecution in
a new light.
Section 9 talks of prohibition of hunting, Section
51 dwells on penalties, while Section 2 defines all
the terms used in the Act. Valmiki TR personnel realised
that using the latter in conjunction with the other
two (or any others, for that matter) only helps them
present a credible case to a judge by spelling out what
the offence itself means according to the Act.
The usage of Section 39(d) which allows authorised
officers to seize vehicles and weapons and declare them
as government property also came as an eye-opener for
them. As Mr Shukla said, Valmiki TR personnel hitherto
used to only take recourse to Section 51 of the Forest
Conservation Act for seizing vehicles. Offenders would
then leave with their vehicles in a matter of days.
Though hunting has ceased to be as rampant as it was
a few decades back, exhibition of trophies by the rich
and the powerful still remains widespread. Clueless
on what they could do, the officials here have now been
bolstered by their knowledge of Sections 40, 41 and
42 of the Act which deal with declarations, inquiry
and preparation of inventories, and certificates of
ownership.
Mr Mishra, however, felt the need to organise such
workshops in Valmiki TR all over again. “The personnel
of such protected areas as Valmiki TR must keep themselves
abreast of wildlife laws. Since existing staff might
be transferred to other areas later on, it must be ensured
that the subsequent incumbents too are legally as sound
as the staff now will be.”
A forester, Mr Samuh Prasad Singh, insisted on the
need for making such workshops an annual feature. “It
would only serve us in good stead if we can keep abreast
with legal provisions and the judgments that are passed
in the courts,” he said.
Speaking on the occasion, Mr Khan felt that the workshop
would go a long way in boosting the morale of the staff
in Valmiki TR. Mr Shukla agreed, and went on to insist
that the knowledge that he himself and his colleagues
had gathered at the workshop would go a long way in
improving their chances of being able to prosecute offenders
in trial courts. He rued the lack of exposure that forest
officials suffered from both in his TR, and elsewhere
in the state.
But all said and done, today, the range officers and
foresters particularly stand a firm lot, armed with
their newly-gained knowledge of wildlife and forest
laws.
|