| WTI's
legal cell cases on policy Issues
Wildlife Trust of India v.
State of Karnataka
The case challenged establishment of a paramilitary
shooting range on the fringes of Bannerghata National
Park, Karnataka. The Karnataka High Court ordered
removal of CRPF from the shooting range. CRPF has
carried out the order.
Ashok Kumar v. State of Bihar and others
(Supreme Court)
A hearing took place on November 18, 2002 and a notice
was issued to the states of Uttaranchal and three
others as well as Union of India to reply to the petition.
The emphasis of the petition has changed from seeking
immediate relief for fund flow to a change in the
fiscal system by which Central Government funds for
tiger conservation are sent to state governments.
WTI will ask for funds to be sent directly to the
tiger reserves instead of routing them through the
finance department at the state capital where these
funds are diverted for other uses. WTI has learnt
that the problem is not restricted to these four states
alone but many others continued to divert funds in
this manner. Assam and Orissa are also seriously at
fault.
Ashok Kumar v. State of Jammu & Kashmir
( J & K High Court)
This is a contempt of court petition against the
state of Jammu and Kashmir for not banning the manufacture
and trade in shahtoosh shawls. After a number of hearings
the state of Jammu and Kashmir has banned the manufacture
and trade of shahtoosh shawls in the state.
Wildlife Trust of India v. National Capital
Territory of Delhi & Others. (Delhi High Court)
This case related to dumping of municipal waste in
Delhi Wildlife Sanctuary. As a result, the dumping
did not take place.
Wildlife Trust of India v. State of Uttar
Pradesh & Others (Allahabad High Court)
This case is related to the draining of wetlands
in Western Uttar Pradesh that are home to the largest
single population of sarus cranes in the world. A
favorable judgment was delivered putting a stop to
the draining of the wetlands and directing the state
to create a protected area at this location.
Ashok Kumar Vs. S.P. Arya and others (Uttaranchal
High Court)
This is a contempt of court petition asking the
irrigation department to evict illegal encroacher
on land of Corbett Tiger Reserve, and vacate surplus
land in possession of the irrigation department itself.
WTI Vs. Union of India and others (Supreme
Court)
The petition asks the Union of India and state governments
to take possession of ivory in possession of erstwhile
traders, and to take positive measures for protection
of elephants. A listing is awaited.
WTI Vs. State of U.P. and others (Supreme
Court through empowered committee)
The case calls for cancellation of a mining lease
inside Hastinapur sanctuary in Uttar Pradesh.
A number of court cases are being
pursued in trial courts relating to wildlife offences.
Back
|